Saturday, December 16, 2023

Higher prices inbound?

In a global economy, prices of goods are directly affected by the price of oceangoing shipping.  If shipping is safe and cheap, then the prices of goods will also be cheaper than they would be if shipping was dangerous and expensive.

For a long time now, shipping has been relatively safe by historical standards.  The U.S. Navy has ruled the waves for decades and has kept the sea lanes free and clear.

Recent activity in the Red Sea threatens to disrupt that status quo.

After taking a hit from a missile to one of its container ships this week, Maersk has decided to avoid the Red Sea and the Suez Canal altogether and go the longer way around the Cape of Good Hope.  A few other shipping companies have followed suit.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/maersk-hapag-lloyd-rethink-red-sea-voyages-after-attacks-on-ships-f117b471

How long will the Red Sea be too dangerous for commercial traffic?  How high will the prices of goods rise?  How long will they stay high before coming back down?  Those are good questions, and I don't have any answers.  But here are a few things to consider:

1.)  Egypt collects fees for use of the Suez Canal.  Decreased traffic means a decrease in foreign currency revenue.  I doubt the Egyptians will be very happy about this, and I'm sure they're currently trying to decide how to deal with the Houthis in a way that will restore Canal traffic to its usual level.  They might resort to military action, but I think a diplomatic solution is far more likely.  They may have already made their decision; who knows.

2.)  The Chinese have a significant interest in the Canal.  About 60% of their exports to Europe pass through it.  Until their Belt & Road Initiative is up and running to a degree sufficient enough to allow them to bypass the Red Sea without suffering any inconvenience, they need the Canal.  Like the Egyptians, the Chinese might pursue either a diplomatic or a military solution, but I think they're more likely than the Egyptians to pursue a military one.  They have the muscle, and due to their status as the world's factory, they would almost certainly have the world's support if they went in and flattened the Houthis.  Also, some Chinese companies own stakes in some Egyptian ports, so there's some added impetus for action.  On the other side of the argument, the Chinese have a long history of making threats but not following through, so the prudent presumption is that they'll back down from conflict as usual.

3.)  After decades of off-shoring its manufacturing base, the U.S. is now dependent on China for manufactured goods.  This dependency was predicated on the assumption that the sea lanes would remain free and clear.  An increase in piracy and privateering changes that equation.  I doubt anything short of the political dissolution of the U.S. will be enough to repatriate the manufacturing, but I can't rule it out.  A quick-and-dirty solution to the Red Sea crisis would be to issue Letters of Marque and Reprisal and let bounty hunters take out the Houthis.  That would be a radical step, and so unlikely that I'm embarrassed to even bring it up, but I think it might be the most politically palatable across the board.  Official action by the Navy and/or Marines is possible, too, but doubtful due to the military's current state of decline and a general demoralization and enervation among the citizenry.  We simply don't have the guts and vitality that Americans had in the days of President Jefferson and Stephen Decatur.

4.)  European nations need Chinese goods, but they don't have the military muscle to solve this problem, so they must go begging and horse trading.  Perhaps the EU will make offers to Turkey or Iran in exchange for their assistance.  I can easily see Erdogan seizing this opportunity to secure boons for his country in exchange for taking action against the Houthis.  He has so far played East and West against each other quite expertly during the Ukraine conflict, so he's definitely clever enough.


So those are my thoughts at the moment.  The biggest loser here is Europe.  They're the ones most directly affected by the disruption in Red Sea traffic.  China doesn't need the Canal to ship stuff to the Americas or Australia, so supplies to those continents should be uninterrupted.

Europe is already facing a cold, dark, expensive winter, and this Red Sea stuff is just piling on.  Add in the various nations' preexisting domestic issues and conflicts between natives and foreigners, and the whole place seems ready to boil over.  Might we see a for-real revolution or shooting war in Western Europe?  I wouldn't put money on it, but I also won't rule it out.

2024 threatens to be exciting.  Prepare accordingly.

Tuesday, December 12, 2023

New high for the year

The S&P 500 closed at a new high for the year after Monday's session.  Gold, meanwhile, was down, a bit unusual in an environment where dollar strength or weakness is driving most of the action of both stocks and commodities.

There are still plenty of warning alarms going off.  You can't raise interest rates the way Jay Powell has and not end up with a correction or a crash or something.  Those chickens will come home to roost at some point.  It's just a matter of when and how many.

There are rumors of a new disease on the way, another 2020-style pandemic.  There are also rumors of other catastrophes, things like cyber attacks.  I don't know how much credence to give those rumors, if any, but I know that a Presidential election year is a good time for something crazy to happen.  Just as the stock market crashed in March of 2020, so might it do the same in 2024.  And, as in 2020, there might be a nice buying opportunity when everyone panics and drives prices down to highly discounted levels.  I missed the great buying opportunity of 2009 due to my own fear; I promised myself I would never make that mistake again.

As things currently stand, the market is making new highs, and that's a bullish signal.  It's also overbought, though, according to oscillators like the RSI, and the MACD has turned slightly downward in what is usually considered a bearish signal.

I think the tiebreaker here is the matter of gaps.  The sessions gapped up several times in recent weeks, and those gaps have yet to be filled.  I think the market wants to consolidate recent gains, and I think it will, but I also think fundamentals and election-motivated media hysteria in the first quarter of 2024 might drive it down further than it currently wants to go.

R.I.P., David Drake

I admit I haven't read much of David Drake's work.  I started one of his books years ago--I think it was Redliners--but just couldn't get into it.  I abandoned it and never tried his stuff again.

Nevertheless, Drake was an important part of the science fiction scene, particularly the mil-SF part.  There's no denying his popularity, and he'll be missed.

And perhaps I'll give another of his books a chance some day.  It's not really fair, after all, to judge an author by only one of that author's books.

But even though I'm not yet a fan, there are certainly plenty of others who are, and I sympathize with them now.  Drake was a big name, and his absence leaves a big hole.

R.I.P., man.